home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- From: rich@weeds.hacktic.nl (Richard v.d. Horst)
- Newsgroups: alt.drugs
- Subject: Fact sheet- The Drug Policy in the Netherlands, Feb. '94 (1/5)
- Message-ID: <042294162436Rnf0.77b9@weeds.hacktic.nl>
- Date: Fri, 22 Apr 1994 16:24:00 GMT
-
- In order to bring more clearness about the Dutch drug policy, I post the
- latest fact sheet- February 1994. I've reformatted it to 79 chars/line to
- ease reading/printing. Please note that my news server is currently having
- problems, so I can't answer any posted replies (but email works properly).
- Typos are OCR's, though I double-checked all tables on their correctness...
-
- Note- I've been notified that #5 on page 7 should be "Importing/Exporting".
-
- - Richard
- ===
- THE DRUG POLICY IN THE NETHERLANDS
-
-
- February 1994
-
-
- Ministry of Welfare, Health Ministry of Justice
- and Cultural Affairs
-
- P.O. Box 3008 P.O. Box 20301
- 2280 MK Rijswijk 2500 EH 's-Gravenhage
- The Netherlands The Netherlands
- Telephone: (31) 703406937 Telephone: (31) 703706915
- Telefax: (31) 703405233 Telefax: (31) 703707933
-
-
- _Table_of_contents:_ page
-
- 1. Description of the situation and trends/statistics 1
- 1.1 Traffic 1
- 1.2 Drug misuse 2
- 1.3 Description of users and type of use 5
-
- 2. Governmental structures responsible for drugs 6
-
- 3. National legislation 6
- 3.1 Basic approach 6
- 3.2 Legislation/penalties concerning production, traffic,
- possession and sale 6
- 3.2.1 Practical enforcement prosecution policy and the expediency
- principle 8
- 3.3 Legislation/penalties eoncerning commerce of precursors
- and essential chemicals 9
- 3.4 International treaties and agreements 9
-
- 4. Practical law enforcement 9
- Organisation of police services / Assessment of current
- effectiveness of law enforcement services/problem
- areas/possible proposals for new policies 9
-
- 5. Information/Education/Prevention 10
- 5.1 General principies 10
- 5.2 Organisation and policy of services responsible for
- prevention activities 11
- 5.3 Prevention of HIV infection/Aids among drug misusers 11
- 5.3.1 Needle exchange schemes and outreach work 12
- 5.3.2 Epidemiology of Aids 12
-
- 6. Treatment and rehabilitation 12
-
- 6.1 General principles of treatment and rehabilitation policy;
- assessment of the programmes 12
- 6.2 General organisation of services / Types of treatment
- offered 13
- 6.3 Assessment of treatment and rehabilitation programmes 14
-
- 7. Drug policy debate in Parliament 16
-
- 8. International cooperation 16
- 8.1 Cooperation within the United Nations system 16
- 8.2 Regional and bilateral cooperation within Europe
- (including money-laundering) 16
- 8.3 Drug liaison officers 16
- 8.4 Drugs-related assistance within and outside Europe 17
- BASIC APPROACH OF DRUG POLICY
-
- The central objective is to restrict as much as possible the risks that drug
- abuse present to drug users themselves, their immediate environment and society
- as a whole. These risks, or the likelihood of harmful effects, are dependent
- not only on the psychotropic or other properties of the substance, but
- primarily on the type of user, the reasons for use and the circumstances in
- which the drugs are taken. Experience has shown that a pragmatic approach aimed
- at seeking solutions for concrete problems is more effective than one that is
- emotional and dogmatic. There is no question of a laissez-faire attitude being
- taken. It is part of Dutch tradition that whatever the probiem to be tackled,
- the effectiveness of the measures to be applied is of primary importance.
- Legislation is obviously considered useful in the Netherlands, but great value
- is likewise attached to strongly organised social control. Although the risks
- to society must of course be taken into account, the government tries to ensure
- that drug users are not caused more harm by prosecution and imprisonment than
- by the use of drugs themselves. Dutch policy is also continuously seeking to
- strike the right balance between the different types of measures. The Minister
- for Welfare, Health and Cultural Affairs has been made responsible for
- coordinating the government's drug policy to which there are two facets: the
- enforcement of the Opium Act and poiicy on prevention and treatment. The
- Minister for Justice is responsible for implementing the Opium Act as far as
- the illicit aspects are concerned.
-
- 1. DESCRIPTION OF THE SITUATION AND TRENDS/STATISTICS
-
- 1.1 _Traffic:_Number_and_quantity_of_seizures_by_substance_(in_kgs)_
-
- 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993
-
- HEROIN (total) * 492 532 406 570 916
- - South East Asia 167 85 49 36 65
- - South West Asia 288 413 308 478 773
- - unknown 37 34 49 56 78
-
- COCAINE 1425 4288 2492 3433 3499
-
- AMPHETAMINES 65 47 128 267 293
- - tablets 24000 2500 30705 142
- - oil (in litres) 90 7 120 60 2
-
- LSD (in dosages) 8075 5146 1630 50002 187082
- LSD (in grs) 64 3
-
- MDA (in kgs) 776 0.35
- MDA (in tablets) 2500000 335
-
- MDMA (in kgs) 0.750 0.322 0.700 300 1.5
- MDMA (in tablets) 930000 48 10286 1625391
- MDMA (in litres) 2
-
- MDEA (in kgs) 6
- MDEA (in tablets) 188532 52053
-
- CANNABIS (total) 42315 109762 96292 94593
- - Hashish 14071 90010 73962 75292 28173
- - Hashoil (in litres) 18.6
- - Marihuana 28234 19752 22330 19301 110049
- - Dutch grown
- Marihuana plants (in number) 71945 313242 150696
- Marihuana plants (in weight) 1245
-
- * The difference between the total quantity of heroin and the sum of the SE
- Asia and SW Asia heroin relates to seized heroin of which the origin could not
- be established (unknown). [Source: Criminal Intelligence Service]
- -2-
-
- _-_General_assessment_of_situation_
-
- Most of all seized heroin originates from South West Asia and was smuggled
- along the Balkan route.
- Chinese crime syndicates have been re-establishing themselves in the illicit
- traffic of heroin coming from South East Asia.
- An increasing number of Nigerian couriers are involved in illicit traffic of
- heroin coming from Asia.
- The quantity of seized cocaine in 1990 increased by 300% compared to 1989 and
- originates from Colombia. There is evidence that Surinam and other countries in
- the Caribbean region have been used as transit countries, from which cocaine is
- trafficked by air and sea.
- The Netherlands police succeeded in detecting clandestine amphetamine
- laboratories and in dismantling several organisations involved in this
- manufacture (using precursors and essential chemicals from Germany and Belgium)
- and exportation.
- The majority of seized cannabis was being shipped or transported by lorries
- from northern africa. The supply of cannabis is in the hands of organized
- groups.
-
- 1.2 DRUG MISUSE
-
- The Netherlands is one of the most densely populated countries of Europe, with
- 15 million inhabitants. Appr. 90% lives in urban areas. Amsterdam has 700,000
- inhabitants.
-
- _-_Estimate_of_total_number_of_drug_misusers/addicts_
-
- - Netherlands: 21,000 addicts.
- Sources: 1) assessments of municipalities; 2) recent research on all
- methadone programmes in the Netheriands (Bureau Driessen, 1990; 1993).
-
- - Amsterdam: 6,000 - 7,000 addicts.
- Source: capture/recapture method based on several data systems: Municipal
- Health Service, Municipal Police, local studies (1990)(1993).
-
- _-_Prevalence/incidence_data_
-
- Prevalence of drug use in 1990 (population of 12 years and over in Amsterdam)
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- Ever used Used past year Used past month
- drug n % n % n % N
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------
- Tobacco 3010 67.7 2066 46.5 1899 42.7 4444
- Alcohol 3820 86.0 3459 77.8 3073 69.1 4444
- Hypnotics 847 19.1 420 9.5 289 6.5 4442
- Sedatives 912 20.5 417 9.4 272 6.1 4439
- Cannabis 1111 25.0 438 9.9 268 6.0 4442
- Cocaine 245 5.5 57 1.3 17 0.4 4440
- Amphetamines 183 4.1 20 0.5 10 0.2 4440
- Ecstasy 56 1.3 30 0.7 5 0.1 4442
- Hallucinogens 182 4.1 13 0.3 3 0.1 4430
- Inhalants 42 0.9 6 0.1 2 0.0 4430
- Opiates 325 7.3 86 1.9 28 0.6 4425
- Pharm. opiates 295 6.7 83 1.9 28 0.6 4425
- Heroin 48 1.0 5 0.1 1 0.0 4425
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
- =============================================================================
-
- From: rich@weeds.hacktic.nl (Richard v.d. Horst)
- Newsgroups: alt.drugs
- Subject: Fact sheet- The Netherlands (2/5)
- Message-ID: <042294173410Rnf0.77b9@weeds.hacktic.nl>
- Date: Fri, 22 Apr 1994 17:34:00 GMT
-
- -3-
-
- Source:
- Licit and illicit drug use in Amsterdam: report of a household survey in 1990
- on the prevalence of drug use among the population of 12 years and over / J.P.
- Sandwijk, P.D.A. Cohen, S. Musterd. Amsterdam: Instituut voor Sociale
- Geografie, Faculteit der Ruimtelijke Wetenschappen, Universiteit van Amsterdam
-
- The table shows that even in Amsterdam (an urban area where drug use is always
- highest) cocaine use was very low in 1990. The househoid survey will be
- repeated in 1994. At present, the most recent data on prevalence of drug use
- are the following data, based on school surveys among pupils aged 12 to 18
- years:
- _______________________________________________________________________________
-
- Frequency of drug use in lifetime for students aged 12 to 18 in percentages
- (N=7,216)
-
- 12-13 yr 14-15 yr 16-17 yr 18+ yr total 12+ yr
- M* F* M F M F M F M F T
- ------------------------------------------------------------
- cannabis 4.2 1.8 15.4 12.6 32.5 19.7 46.8 22.0 16.6 10.4 13.6
-
- cocaine 0.6 0.7 1.7 1.0 3.6 1.9 2.9 1.5 1.9 1.1 1.5
-
- XTC 1.9 0.7 4.7 2.7 6.9 3.0 6.9 1.5 4.5 2.1 3.3
-
- amphetamines 0.8 0.6 2.6 1.4 5.1 2.8 5.2 0.8 2.8 1.4 2.1
-
- heroin 0.7 0.2 1.2 0.5 0.3 0.8 1.7 0.0 0.9 0.5 0.7
-
- * M = Male
- F = Female
- _______________________________________________________________________________
-
- Frequency of drug use during previous month (= current use) for students aged
- 12 to 18 in percentages (N=7,216)
-
- 12-13 yr 14-15 yr 16-17 yr 18+ yr total 12+ yr
- M* F* M F M F M F M F T
- ------------------------------------------------------------
- cannabis 2.1 0.7 7.4 4.6 17.9 7.8 17.0 6.1 8.8 4.1 6.5
-
- cocaine 0.3 0.1 0.3 0.2 0.6 0.7 1.2 0.0 0.4 0.3 0.3
-
- XTC 0.5 0.1 1.2 0.9 2.5 1.0 2.3 0.8 1.3 0.6 1.0
-
- amphetamines 0.4 0.2 0.7 0.2 1.6 0.6 0.6 0.8 0.8 0.3 0.6
-
- heroin 0.2 0.1 0.3 0.2 0.0 0.1 0.6 0.0 0.2 0.1 0.2
-
- * M = Male
- F = Female
- _______________________________________________________________________________
- -4-
-
- The table shows that current cannabis and cocaine use is relatively low. The
- average last month prevalence of cannabis use in the _entire_ (12-18 years)
- sample was 6.5 %; cocaine 0.3%.
-
- Source: Youth and risky behavior. Results from the third National Youth Health
- Care Survey on smoking, drinking, drug use and gambling by school children from
- the age of 10 years. Kuipers, Mensink and de Zwart, NIAD, Utrecht, 1993. The
- standardized methodology has been developed by the Epidemiology experts of the
- Pompidou group of the Council of Europe.
-
- In two earlier studies it was found that cannabis use has been rather stable
- (slight differences upwards and downwards) since the beginning of the
- seventies. Sources: Korf: "Twenty years of soft drug use in Holland: a
- retrospective view, based on twenty years of prevalence studies", Dutch Journal
- of Alcohol, Drugs and other Psychotropic Substances, 1988 (14) nr. 3, 81-89
- and: Driessen and Van Dam: "The development of cannabis use in the Netherlands,
- some European countries and the USA since 1969", Dutch Journal of Alcohol,
- Drugs and other Psychotropic Substances, 1989 (15) nr 1, 2-15.
-
- The recent NIAD-study cited above indicates that the prevalence of cannabis use
- among school children of 12-18 years has increased in recent years. However,
- the dominant pattern of consumption is still incidental and recreational. As
- there have been no significant changes in the Dutch policy on cannabis in
- recent years, the higher popularity of cannabis among young people may reflect
- changes in Western European youth culture. Similar increases of the prevalence
- of cannabis use among youngsters have recently been reported for Germany, The
- United States, Norway, Denmark and the United Kingdom. In view of the increase
- in prevalence, the prevention efforts will be intensified.
-
- Ecstacy (MDMA) was first seen in the Netherlands in 1985. in 1988 Ecstacy was
- brought under legal controI (Schedule I, Opium Act), mainly to prevent
- large-scale trafficking and export. In 1993 Eve (MDEA) was brought under legal
- control as well (Scheduie I, Opium Act), in reaction to agressive marketing
- efforts of producers. At present, use ot Ecstacy can be observed especially in
- the circuit of so-called house parties and discotheques and is of an
- experimental and recreational nature. The NIAD-study cited above shows a 3.3 %
- life-time prevalence of use of Ecstacy among school children of 12-18 years.
- The last-month prevalence in this group was 1.0 %. While there is no evidence
- of large-scale misuse, the situation warrants careful monitoring from a
- preventive point of view, as the pills sold as Ecstacy sometimes in fact
- contain substances with a higher risk, such as amphetamines and LSD. The NIAD
- has developed a special project to monitor developments in this area.
-
- _-_Indirect_indicators_
-
- _Treatment_clients_
-
- Methadone is supplied to 7,000 people on an average day (point prevalence) in
- appr. 60 municipalities. (This means that the total number of addicts receiving
- methadone is greater than 7,000!) Source: National (State) Inspectorate for
- Drugs (1990); Driessen (1990, 1993).
- -5-
-
- In 1992 the Consultation Bureaus for Alcohol and Drug problems had 21,715
- clients, which is 39% of the total case-load.
-
- _Drug_related_deaths_
-
- Netherlands, 1991:
- 74 residents (primary and secondary cause of death). Source: National Bureau
- for Statistics, based on the WHO International Classification of Diseases
- (ICD-9).
-
- Amsterdam, 1992:
- 19 residents. Sources: annual registration Municipal Health Service, 1993;
- methodology validated in an analysis of the backgrounds of 'Acute death after
- drug misuse in Amsterdam" (in Dutch) by Cobelens, Schrader and Sluijs, 1990.
-
- 1.3 DESCRIPTION OF USERS AND TYPE OF USE
-
- _-_The_most_used_drugs_
-
- Cannabis products are the most popular illicit drugs.
- Cannabis use generally does not create problems to users.
- Heroin is still the preferred drug among addicts, although they do not restrict
- their use to heroin and combine all manner of substances, including cocaine,
- other psychotropic substances (e.g. benzodiazepines) and alcohol.
- "Crack" use is almost absent in the Netherlands.
-
- _-_Average_age_of_drug_misusers_
-
- The average age of addicts is rising and today lies between 25 and 35; people
- are older when they take drugs for the first time (with the exception of
- cannabis).
-
- _-_Socio-demographic_profile_of_drug_misusers_
-
- Cocaine use in the general population (primary cocaine users in all social
- strata and income groups) seems to be mainly experimental and/or recreational.
- An in-depth field study in Amsterdam among experienced users (at least 5 years
- of use) revealed that the average age of cocaine users was 30 years and the age
- at which they started was 22 years. The large majority was non-deviant and 50%
- never use more than half a gram a week. The users do not underestimate the
- negative effects, which mainly occur at a level of 2.5 gram a week. 86.2% of
- the users reported to have stopped for more than a month, against 11.9% who
- never stopped since they started cocaine use. Since the use is embedded in
- non-marginalized social settings where confrontation with the police is rare,
- some kinds of informal use-control rules could be developed (Cohen, 1989), A
- follow-up study has been carried out (Cohen & Sas, 1993) . One of the main
- conclusions of this study is that almost half of the 1991 follow-up respondents
- had ceased cocaine consumption since they were interviewed in 1987.
-
- Over the years drug misuse increased among groups in a relatively disadvantaged
- social and economic position, particularly among ethnic minorities from Morocco
- and Turkey.
- -6-
-
- _-_Routes_of_administration_
-
- A recent research report confirms that the prevalence of drug injecting has
- been steadily decreasing (Grund & Blanken, 1993). A growing majority of drug
- users, 70 - 75 %, now prefers the method of smoking heroin or "chasing the
- dragon" (inhaling the fume). On average, only 25 - 30 % of the hard drug users
- now practises injecting. According to the researchers, this development of a
- less harmful pattern of heroin use can be seen as a result of the pragmatic
- drug policy. The comparatively low repression of drug users and the enforcement
- emphasis on the importation level of the drug trade created the situation in
- which a stable and fairly relaxed consumer market could emerge, in which heroin
- is sold of reasonable price and at a purity level (40 %) sufficient for
- smoking.
-
- 2. GOVERNMENTAL STRUCTURES RESPONSIBLE FOR DRUGS
-
- _-_Basic_organisation_of_responsibilities_at_national_and_local_level_and_the
- _coordinating_bodies_
-
- The larger Municipal Police Forces, for which the burgomasters carry
- responsibility, have special criminal investigation departments (CIDs) dealing
- exclusively with offences under the Opium Act. They receive support from other
- CIDs or from uniformed police when undertaking major operations. The National
- and Municipal Police work in close cooperation with the Central Narcotics
- agency of the National Criminal Intelligence Service (CRI) in The Hague, for
- which the Minister of Justice is responsible. The CRI collects information in
- the Netherlands and abroad and passes it on to the local police, one of its
- sources being specially appointed drugs liaison officers stationed in foreign
- countries (see also item 8.3). In larger cities, policy on actions against
- illegal offenders of the Opium Act is usually preceded by tripartite
- consultation between the burgomaster, the head of the Public Prosecutions
- Department and the Iocal chief of police.
-
- As to treatment policy, in 1994 23 larger municipalities (working closely
- together with the other relevant cities in 23 regions) receive a special budget
- from the (national) Ministry of the Interior and are directly responsible for
- treatment policy and for funding treatment.
-
-
- 3. NATIONAL LEGISIATION
-
- 3.1 _Basic_approach_
-
- Responsibility for implementing the Opium Act rests with the Minister for
- Welfare, Health and Cultural Affairs for the licit aspects (strict supervision
- of the production and medical use of the drugs) and the Minister of Justice for
- the illicit aspects: law enforcement policy.
-
- 3.2 _Legislation/penalties_concerning_production,_traffic,_possession_and_sale_
-
- The Opium Act of 1919 was radically amended in 1928 and again in 1976. The
- possession, sale, transport, trafficking, manufacture, etc., of all drugs
- mentioned in
-
- =============================================================================
-
- From: rich@weeds.hacktic.nl (Richard v.d. Horst)
- Newsgroups: alt.drugs
- Subject: Fact sheet- The Netherlands (3/5)
- Message-ID: <042294173542Rnf0.77b9@weeds.hacktic.nl>
- Date: Fri, 22 Apr 1994 17:35:00 GMT
-
- -7-
-
- this Act, except for medical or scientific purposes, is deemed a punishable
- offence. _Drug_consumption_is_not_prohibited_by_law_. The Opium Act also
- provides for the strict supervision of the production and medical use of the
- drugs referred to in the Act. Hemp (cannabis) products and other drugs are
- subject to different statutory penalties. Policy in the administration of
- criminal justice likewise maintains a clear cut distinction between drug users
- and traffickers, one of its aims being to avoid classifying the possession of
- drugs by users as serious crimes, as they would then no longer be accessible to
- any form of prevention or voluntary intervention. A distinction is also made
- between 'drugs presenting unacceptable risks' (such as heroin, cocaine, LSD,
- amphetamines and hash oil), classified as Schedule I drugs in the Opium Act,
- and 'hemp (cannabis) products', classified as Schedule II substances in the
- Opium Act. The possession of any of these substances for personal use is
- subject to less severe penalties than possession for the purpose of
- trafficking. The following table indicates the maximum penalty which can be
- imposed for offences involving various substances.
-
- Substance Offence Maximum penalty
-
- 1. Schedule I importing or exporting 12 years'imprisonment
- substances (opiates, (trafficking) and/or FL.100,000,- fine
- cocaine, etc.)
-
- 2. Schedule I selling, transporting, 8 years'imprisonment
- substances (opiates, manufacturing and/or FL.100,000,- fine
- cocaine, etc.)
-
- 3. Schedule I planning import or 6 years'imprisonment
- substances (opiates, export, etc. and/or FL.100,000,- fine
- cocaine, etc.)
-
- 4. Schedule I possession 4 years'imprisonment
- substances (opiates, and/or FL.100,000,- fine
- cocaine, etc.)
- 4 years' imprisonment
- 5. Hemp products selling manufacturing, and/or FL.100,000,- fine
- (hashish & marijuana) possesion
-
- - Contrary to the general rule, offences under the Qpium Act may carry both a
- penalty of a fine and an unconditional term of imprisonment.
- - If the vafue of the things with which such offences have been comrnitted or
- which have been obtained wholly or partially by means of such offences,
- exceeds a quarter of the maximum fine, a fine of one category higher may be
- imposed: FL.100,000,- would become FL.1,000,000,-.
- -8-
-
- 6. Hemp products selling, manufacturing, 2 years'imprisonment
- (hashish & marijuana) possession and/or FL.25,000,- fine
-
- 7. Schedule I possession for personal 1 years'imprisonment
- substances (opiates, use and/or FL.10,000,- fine
- cocaine, etc.)
-
- 8. Hemp products selling, manufacturing, 1 month's imprisonment
- (hashish & marijuana) possession of up to 30 and/or FL.5,000,- fine
- grams
-
- Explanatory notes
-
- Offences which are punishable under the Opium Act are subject to the general
- criminal law provision whereby the maximum penalty may be increased by
- one-third when the offence has been committed more than once.
- In that case the maximum penalty is 16 years imprisonment.
- - Other offences, such as advertising the sale/supply of drugs, are covered by
- the Opium Act.
- - In accordance with an amendment to the Opium Act in 1985, both trafficking
- and activities preparatory to trafficking in Schedule I drugs are now
- offences. This enables action to be taken at an earlier stage in the chain of
- trafficking operations and provides greater opportunities for dealing with
- the organisers. Furthermore, any person who attempts to import drugs into the
- Netherlands, regardless of their nationality. In general, 'conspiring' or
- planning to commit an offence is not deemed punishable in Dutch criminal law.
- - A Bill is currently being prepared which will greatly facilitate the
- detection, freezing and confiscation of the proceeds of criminal acts,
- thereby considerably increasing the efficiency with which national and
- international drugs traffic can be combated.
-
- 3.2.1 _Practical_enforcement:_prosecution_policy_and_the_expediency_principle_
-
- One of the basic premises of Duteh criminal procedure is the expediency
- principle laid down in the Code of Criminal Procedure whereby the Public
- Prosecutions Department is empowered to refrain from instituting criminal
- proceedings if there are weighty public interests to be considered 'on grounds
- deriving from the general good'. Guidelines have therefore been established for
- detecting and prosecuting offences under the Opium Act. Similar guidelines also
- exist for other offences such as the illegal possession of firearms, pirate
- broadcasting and exceeding the speed limit. The guidelines contain
- recommendations regarding the penalties to be imposed and set out the
- priorities to be observed in detecting and prosecuting offences. The
- 'Guidelines for detection and prosecution policy for offences under the Opium
- Act' established in 1976 are based on the priorities already laid down in the
- Opium Act.
-
- International drug trafficking has the highest priority, possession of drugs
- the lowest. This does not, however, imply that we take no action at all with
- regard to possession: drugs are confiscated, but an addict is not thrown into
- jail if he has less than half a gramme in his possession. We try to offer
- assistance in these cases. An early intervention network set up by the Alcohol
- and Drug Clinics, provides for counsellors to visit suspects at police stations
- in the Netherlands. The low priority accorded the possession and sale of up to
- 30 grams of hemp products has resulted in dealers selling small quantities of
- hemp products in youth
- -9-
-
- centres and so-called coffee shops. The authorities keep a fixed eye on these
- sales points.
- By doing so the authorities follow the guidelines- no dealers quantities, that
- means > 30 gram, no sale of any other drugs (e.g. cocaine, heroin), no
- advertisements, no encouragement to use, no sale to minors. Policy aims to
- maintain a separation between the market for drugs presenting unacceptable
- risks and the market for hemp products.
- In addition, the work of the tripartite consultative body, has led in recent
- years to a number of preventive maesures being included in new administrative
- rules as f.i. in relation to the location of coffee shops; on the other hand,
- these rules make it possible for a mayor to close the shops in cases when a
- dealer has been arrested and will be prosecuted. This latter measure is very
- effective: if the coffee shop in question is allowed to remain open, other
- persons will continue the dealer's activities as soon as he has been arrested.
-
- 3.3 _Legislation/penalties_concerning_commerce_of_precursors_and_essential
- _chemicals_
-
- Article 12 of the Vienna convention has been implemented within the European
- Union; a decision was recentiy taken to amend our on legislation on the legal
- traffic in precursors and chemicals. The Ministry of Economic Affairs has
- already changed the legislation for the import and export to third countries. A
- separate Act including regulations on the control of the legal traffic within
- the Community has been drafted and will pass Parliament soon; the Economic
- Surveillance Service will be responsible for supervision.
-
- 3.4 _International_treaties_and_agreements_
-
- The Netherlands have ratified the Vienna Convention of 1988, the Convention of
- Strassbourg of 1990 and the 1971 Convention on psychotropic substances,
- accompanied by the legislation implementing them, last year.
-
- The Minister of Justice signed an agreement on asset sharing and mutual
- assistance in confiscation procedures with the United States of America and the
- United Kingdom.
-
- 4. PRACTICAL LAW ENFORCEMENT
-
- _Organisation_of_police_services_/_Assessment_of_current_effectiveness_of_law
- _enforcement_services/problem_areas/possible_proposals_for_new_policies_
-
- Since time immemorial, its geographical location has made the Netherlands a
- transit country for drug smuggling. For this reason, the police and the public
- prosecutors office have always accorded highest priority to combating wholesale
- trafficking. With a view to the ratification of the Schengen Agreement, a
- number of measures have been taken to intensify external frontier controls:
- - officials of the Royal Military Constabulary and customs authorities who are
- no longer needed along the internal frontiers have been transferred to
- Rotterdam and Schiphol, and some will be employed to combat cross-frontier
- offences within the Schengen area;
- -10-
-
- - at the end of 1992 a multidisciplinary team was set up at Schiphol
- (comprising customs, police and Royal Military Constabulary) to combat drug
- smuggling;
- - the container checks set up and coordinated by the customs authorities is
- being further refined and harmonised in consultation with officials
- responsible for checks in other major European ports.
-
- The Dutch police has recently undergone reorganisation, and the country is now
- divided into 25 regions. A 26th force also exists, including the National
- Criminal Intelligence Service (CRI), which plays a coordinating role in the
- fight against drugs. The CRI is responsible for maintaining contacts with drugs
- liaison officers detached to this country and with the police officers sent to
- various other countries (Pakistan, Thailand, Venezuela, Colombia, the
- Netherlands Antilles, Turkey and several European member states) by the
- Netherlands.
-
- This year (1994) sees the launching of Europol in The Hague, an organisation
- that will strive to improve international cooperation in the fight against
- drugs.
-
- Much has been achieved in terms of legislation over the course of the past 4
- years:
- - the scope for confiscation has been greatly expanded in the case of serious
- drug offenders, making it possible to seize the illicit gains from drug
- trafficking (based on the 1992 Strasbourg Convention);
- - measures have been introduced to curb the laundering of money
- - witnesses who have been threatened are now given police protection;
- - the coercive measures available to the police have been expanded to include,
- for example, more sophisticated telephone tapping equipment. Infiltration
- into criminal organisations and controlled deliveries have been routine
- practices in police investigations for some considerable time.
-
- Within the territory covered by the Schengen Agreement, regional liaison
- networks wiil be set up in Benelux and France to combat drug tourism.
- Consultations held in this framework wili aim to improve cooperation between
- different police forces and courts.
-
- 5. INFORMATION/EDUCATION/PREVENTION
-
- 5.1 _General_principles_
-
- The basic premise of information/education is that information on the risks of
- drug use and on the risks attaching to the use of alcohol and tobacco should be
- presented together. This general information has been incorporated in the
- broader framework of the primary school subjects "promotion of healthy
- behaviour" and "promotion of social skills" (such as: increase consciousness of
- social influences and to learn skills to resist these influences) in order to
- be able to cope with the risks of life in general. Secondary school pupils are
- also encouraged to act responsibly in this respect. The significance of
- information as a means of preventing drug (and alcohol) abuse should not be
- overestimated, however. Various studies have shown that publicity is
- ineffective in preventing the problem of drug abuse, particularly where it
- seeks to emphasize the dangers invoived by presenting warning, deterring or
- sensational facts. Publicity of this kind, which is likely to be one-sided and
- often counter-productive, is therefore rejected by the Dutch government which
- is likewise
-
- =============================================================================
-
- From: rich@weeds.hacktic.nl (Richard v.d. Horst)
- Newsgroups: alt.drugs
- Subject: Fact sheet- The Netherlands (4/5)
- Message-ID: <042294173833Rnf0.77b9@weeds.hacktic.nl>
- Date: Fri, 22 Apr 1994 17:38:00 GMT
-
- -11-
-
- disinclined to conduct mass media campaigns on the subject, which are
- unavoidable untargeted. Since the level of drug consumption in the Netherlands
- is rather low the message would mainly reach those who are not inclined to use
- drugs.
-
- Research into the lifestyles of heroin addicts in the Netherlands has given
- rise to new attitudes towards prevention and widened understanding for the
- reasons why people turn to drugs; it has also called into question the
- possibility of prevention, especially by means of information. Moreover, it was
- found that to start using drugs does not automatically lead to addiction. A
- large number of people experiment with drugs without actually becoming
- addicted. There are many types of users with many different lifestyles.
- Measures to prevent occasional users from becoming addicted are therefore
- extremely important and preventing problems is accordingly given at least equal
- emphasis as preventing the use of drugs.
- In view of the above, the Dutch government believes that drug use should be
- shorn of its taboo image and its sensational and emotional overtones. The image
- of the user and addict should be demythologised and reduced to its real
- proportions, for it is precisely the stigma paradoxically enough, that
- exercises such a strong attraction on some young people. In spite of the more
- general principles of prevention there is education/information to risk groups:
- "heavy" experimenters and those who live in surroundings where drug use is
- considered "normal". Many city-funded care facilities (e.g. street workers)
- carry out such prevention activities, making use of specific methods and
- materials (see also item 6.2).
-
- 5.2 _Organisation_and_policy_of_services_responsible_for_prevention_activities_
-
- The national government only creates good conditions for the development,
- implementation and evaluation of health education. For example by financing two
- institutes: the National Centre on Health Education in Utrecht, which
- stimulates health education throughout the country (information and
- documentation, increasing of expert knowledge, development of methodology,
- research) and the National Institute on Alcohol and Drugs (NIAD), aIso in
- Utrecht, with a similar function. NIAC primarily develops programmes and
- materials for the prevention departments of drug treatment institutions (CADs,
- see item 6.2.), which on their part carry out activities directed to
- intermediaries, such as school teachers, youth workers, general health
- professionals (GP's) etc. The vocational training for health education
- professionals takes place in several government funded universities.
- A Bill (1990) on General Health Prevention charges the municipalities (in many
- larger cities implemented by municipal health services) to develop health
- prevention activities to the general pubiic.
- Taking into account the abovementioned general principles it is the freedom of
- each individual school to decide how to carry out their health education
- programmes by their own teachers. They may -and many do- make use of the
- programmes developed by the beforementioned local programmes or National
- Institutes. Usually parents are not involved, neither is the police. The
- involvement of the police would only reinforce the negative and sensational
- aspects associated with drug use and the creation of new myths.
-
- 5.3 _Prevention_of_HIV_infection/Aids_among_drug_misusers_
-
- Keeping close contact with drug addicts (see item 6.1.) is a prerequisite for
- an effective Aids prevention policy. The supply and use of sterile needles and
- syringes
- -12-
-
- in exchange for used ones and the supply of condoms is one way of limiting the
- spread of HIV but is not a panacea. It must be embedded in a broader care
- system. Persuasive face-to-face counseling, in order to change addicts' risky
- behaviour in favour of safer practices, is essential.
-
- 5.3.1 _Needle_exchange_schemes_and_outreach_work_
-
- There are about 130 needle and syringe exchange schemes now running in 60
- municipalities. The schemes exhibit several differences in terms of size, type
- of agency that is responsible, accessibility, outreach activities, opening
- hours etc.. In 1992, 1,000,000 syringes were exchanged in Amsterdam.
- Exchange schemes may be part of methadone programmes run by drug treatment
- agencies or municipal health services. The special programmes for street
- prostitutes in the larger cities also provide syringes. In a few municipalities
- pharmacists exchange needles and syringes. Some schemes deliver syringes and
- containers at private homes of isolated drug users and drug dealers. Some
- schemes are mobile, making use of minibuses and vans that make stops at several
- locations. Also, outreach workers provide syringes in the street or at private
- homes. Some cities experiment with slot machines for needle exchange, to
- provide syringes after the regular opening hours.
-
- 5.3.2 _Epidemiology_of_Aids:_
-
- As of October, 1993, the total (dead and alive) number of Aids cases in the
- Netherlands was 2783. The table below shows the cumulative Aids cases per
- transmission group:
-
- Homo/bisexual 2131 (76.0 %)
- IV drug user 260 ( 9.0 %) \ 10 %
- Homo/bisexual IV drug user 28 ( 1.0 %) /
- Haemophiliac/coagul. disorder 46 ( 1.7 %)
- Transfusion recipient 38 ( 1.4 %)
- Heterosexual contact 220 ( 7.9 %)
- Mother-to-child 13 ( 0.5 %)
- Other/unknown 47 ( 1.7 %)
-
- The proportion of injecting drug users among the number of Aids patients slowly
- increases. There is no evidence of an explosive development.
-
- 6. TREATMENT AND REHABILITATION
-
- 6.1 _General_principles_of_treatment_and_rehabilitation_policy;_assessment_of
- _the_programmes_
-
- It is tried to make greater and more efficient use of general, particularly
- primary, care facilities. Projects have been set up to encourage addicts and
- former addicts to make use of general facilities, including health and social
- services and youth welfare and housing facilities that are available to all
- members of the public, as a means of preserving or re-establishing social
- integration.
- -13-
-
- Every effort is made to reach and assist as many addicts as possible, which
- approach can claim a success rate of between 70% and 80% (Korf and Hoogenhout,
- 1990). Assistance is not aimed solely at combating addiction and the behaviour
- associated with it, since people who do not feel the need to get off drugs or
- are not capable of doing so, would remain beyond the reach of help. This could
- lead to further social isolation, degradation and marginalization. There are
- forms of care and treatment which are not primarily intended to end addiction
- as such but to improve addicts' physical well-being and help them to function
- in society, the inability to give up drug use being accepted as a fact for the
- time being. This kind of assistance is called 'harm reduction' and may take the
- form of field work, initial reception, the supply of substitute drugs -mainly
- methadone-, material support and opportunities for social rehabilitation.
- Failure to provide this type of care and support, would simply make matters
- worse and increase the risk to the individual and to society. For those who
- want to achieve a drug-free existence a wide variety of services is also
- available.
- The broad ambit and easy aecessibility of care is essential to the effective
- implementation of AIDS prevention measures.
-
- 6.2 _General_organisation_of_services_/_Types_of_treatment_offered_
-
- a. The Medical Consultation Bureaus for Alcohol and Drug Problems (CADs) are
- autonomous non-governmental institutions, the entire costs of which are paid
- directly by 23 municipalities and 19 probation boards. 75% of these funds are
- provided by the Ministry of the Interior through these municipalities and 25%
- by the Ministry of Justice through the probation boards. The CADs are also
- active in the field of probation; one aspect is the initial reception of drug
- addicts in police stations, where an effort is made to establish contact that
- may lead to the acceptance of further aid during and after detention.
- Although the CADs primarily provide non-residential mental health care, their
- services are oriented towards social work, as the majority of their staff
- (appr. 900 in all) are social workers. The objectives of individual CADs may
- vary from kicking the habit (drugfree), to stabilising the functioning of
- addicts by supplying the substitute drug methadone on a "maintenance basis"
- (stable dosage). "Reduction based" methadone programmes are also applied
- (gradually reduced dosages to nil). A variety of methods is used, including
- psychotherapy, group therapy, material assistance, family therapy, counselling,
- and advising groups of parents. An increasingly important area of the CADs'
- work is prevention (see item 5.2), including AIDS control (needle-exchange,
- information and education).
- The nationwide network of CADs comprises 16 main branches, 44 subsidiary
- branches and 45 consulting rooms. The total budget for 1993 amounted to appr.
- FL. 80 million.
-
- b. Several municipal authorities have set up their own methadone programmes
- which are run by the municipal health services (budget: appr. FL. 7 million).
- Methadone is now supplied either by a CAD or the municipal health service in
- virtually all municipalities with a drug problem. Like the CADs the municipal
- health programs have a central role in the field of AIDS prevention. Methadone
- is being supplied to 7,000 addicts on an average day in appr. 60
- municipalities.
-
- c. The social welfare projects for drug users are part of a wide range of
- social welfare services aimed at young people, and directed primarily to
- prevention or risk
- -14-
-
- reduction. Multiple risk groups are not uncommon, such as the unemployed,
- ethnic minorities, and young people from marginal groups. These projects are
- also subsidized by the municipalities, because the choice of projects can best
- be made at local level. The projects listed below concentrate on different
- types of aid and are geared to young peopie in particular: they are easily
- accessible and are designed to have the widest possible outreach.
- - projects aimed at preventing the social isolation of addicts;
- - projects aimed at making contact with addicts and referring them to general
- of specialised aid agencies;
- - social assistance and crisis centre projects;
- - day and night centres where psychosocial assistance is provided;
- - social rehabilitation projects for addicts and former addicts, comprising
- such facilities as supervised accommodation, vocational and other training,
- assistance in adjusting to work, and aftercare.
-
- The total budget for these services for 1993 amounted to appr. FL. 55 million
- for almost 90 projects in 45 municipaiities. Assistance to addicts of
- Surinamese origin (Latin America) has increased considerably, drug use among
- Moluccans (Asia) is decreasing sharply, whilst youngsters from the
- Mediterranean countries, including Morocco, are turning to drugs in greater
- numbers. Some 550 people are employed in these services.
-
- d. Residential facilities for the drug-free treatment of drug addicts and
- alcoholics are situated throughout the Netherlands, providing a total of 1,060
- beds for the two categories of patients between which no sharp distinction is
- made.
- These facilities may take the form of an independent clinic or therapeutic
- communities or special units in general psychiatric hospitals.
- Various types of treatment are available:
- - crisis intervention and detoxification which may last between two days and
- three weeks;
- - clinical treatment lasting from three months to a year, aimed at overcoming
- addiction.
- These facilities cost about FL. 80 million (as of 1993) and are funded from
- contributions made under the Exceptional Medical Expenses (Compensation) Act,
- which is part of the public health insurance system.
-
- 6.3 _Assessment_of_treatment_and_rehabilitation_programmes_
-
- - The number of addiets and drug deaths are considered to be indicators of the
- effectiveness of drug policies: see item 1.2.
-
- - The medical supply of methadone by drug treatment agencies in the Netherlands
- has been evaluated (Driessen, 1990, 1993). At present, drug counselors view
- reduction of health risks (HIV, Hepatitis B) and improvement of the social
- situation of clients as rather more important goals than just ending drug
- use. Nevertheless, a fourth of the clients follow a reduction programme that
- involves reducing the methadone dosage every week.
-
- - The accessibility of the treatment sector has significantly improved during
- the last decade. About 75% of the current addicts now come into contact with
- any type of treatment agency, as compared to about 40% in the early eighties.
- This is a
-
- =============================================================================
-
- From: rich@weeds.hacktic.nl (Richard v.d. Horst)
- Newsgroups: alt.drugs
- Subject: Fact sheet- The Netherlands (5/5)
- Message-ID: <042294173954Rnf0.77b9@weeds.hacktic.nl>
- Date: Fri, 22 Apr 1994 17:39:00 GMT
-
- success in itself! Methadone is also provided more frequently: 75% of the
- clients receive methadone -although not daily-, vs. 40% some 10 years ago.
- The researchers qualify the dosages as low.
-
- - A fourth of the clients receiving methadone has been integrated into society.
- They have found employment or are completing studies. A third of the clients
- appears to be in control of their addiction and uses little or no more
- heroin. A fourth of the clients suffers from serious physical and social
- problems. Next to methadone they use a lot of other substanees, are often in
- bad health and are unable to adapt themselves to the demands of treatment. Of
- all methadone clients, 20% have been imprisoned during the last year.
-
- Next to the provision of methadone, other forms of help are also being used.
- Of all clients, 42% applies for medical assistance and 30% applies for social
- work. In addition, more therapeutic forms of assistance are available, such
- as psychotherapy and family therapy. However, only 1 to 4% of the clients
- make use of these kinds of therapy.
-
- - Some results of a study of clients of methadone programmes outside the four
- large cities in the Netherlands:
- - a majority of clients use methadone on a regular basis;
- - almost all clients (95 %) use heroin as well, but only a minority (37 %) on
- a daily basis;
- - 75 % of the clients use cocaine, 10 % of them do so on a daily basis;
- - half of the clients are not criminally active; half are employed at least
- during part of the year;
- - 83 % have a stable housing situation; half have a stable relationship with
- a partner;
- - 6 % of the clients report to be seropositive for HIV (7 % of the injecting
- clients, 4 % of non-injectors);
- - 45 % are still at risk for HIV-infection, due to unsafe use and/or unsafe
- sex (Driessen, 1992).
-
- - Swierstra (1990) found in a long term follow-up study that the use of hard
- drugs is related to a specific way of life, upon which the addict may become
- even more dependent than upon his drugs. Two-thirds of his respondents have
- stopped taking drugs and are no longer criminally active or, when still
- addicted, hardly so. This process is still going on among the respondents: a
- continuing decrease in criminality, a continuing increase in abstinence.
- Methadone appeared to have played an important role in bridging a problematic
- period in their lifetime.
-
- - It is known from drug free facilities that many of their patients have had
- long experience with methadone, being of decisive importance to eventual
- kicking the habit. The existence of 'harm reduction' facilities did not
- prevent an increasing number of addicts who do want to kick their habit from
- making use of drug-free facilities; in Amsterdam this number of addicts has
- doubled during the last ten years.
-
- - Grapendaal and Leuw (1991) found that in their Amsterdam study among drug
- addicts, more than 40% of the sample had not used heroin or only little less
- than
- half a gram, in the previous week. A strang correlation could be established
- with methadone use. They also state that -only- a minority of 25% conducts a
- lifestyle of heavy drug use and frequent criminal behaviour.
-
- 7. DRUG POLICY DEBATE IN PARLIAMENT
-
- In March and April 1993, the drug policy was discussed at length in Parliament.
- On the basis of this debate, it has been decided that the government will
- maintain the current drug policy, considering its relatively good results.
- Consequently, the primary aim of the policy remains the safeguarding of health,
- while the Minister for Welfare, Health and Cultural Affairs remains responsible
- for coordinating the governments drug policy. However, some amendments have
- been deemed necessary.
-
- First of all, to prevent public disorder as well as to ensure separation of
- drug markets, the supervision of the so-called cannabis coffeeshops will be
- tightened up. Secondly, the government has decided to make a more intensive use
- of the existing instruments for placing problematic drug users under
- constraint. In other words, to give them the choice between prison or
- treatment. In December 1993, the State Secretary for Welfare, Health and
- Cultural Affairs and the Minister of Justice have presented a note to
- Parliament, outlining a plan of action to take more addicts out of the justice
- system and to offer them help. This approach will help reduce the pressure on
- the justice system. The action plan explicitly acknowledges that the policy
- will be effective only if there are sufficient monitoring facilities and/or
- after-care projects for the reinsertion of these persons into society.
-
- 8. INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION
-
- 8.1 _Cooperation_within_the_United_Nations_system_
-
- The Netherlands has been a member of the UN Commission on Narcotic Drugs since
- many years and has chaired this Commission in 1991.
-
- 8.2 _Regional_and_bilateral_cooperation_within_Europe_(including
- _money-laundering_
-
- Cooperation and mutual assistance have been set up to implement the specific
- provisions of the Schengen Agreement, the Benelux Agreement on Extradition and
- the European Convention on Extradition and Mutual Assistance. In addition the
- Netherlands signed several bilateral agreements on this matter, for example
- with the United Kingdom. There have also been established regular bilateral
- consultations on drug policy with the United Kingdom.
- The Netherlands are member of different technical police working groups of the
- Pompidou group, as f.i. the Airport and maritime seaport group.
-
- 8.3 _Drug_liaison_officers_
-
- See also item 2.
- The National Criminal Intelligence Service (CRI) has appointed drug liaison
- officers stationed in Thailand, Pakistan, Venezuela, Colombia, Interpol Lyon,
- the Netherlands Antilles and in Turkey and Spain. Under the aegis of the CRI a
- number of police officers from 11 countries have been stationed in the
- Netherlands,
- thus ensuring fruitful cooperation between their countries and the Netherlands'
- authorities.
-
- 8.4 _Drugs-related_assistance_within_and_outside_Europe_
-
- The Netherlands is closely involved in international efforts to suppress
- production, trafficking and consumption of narcotic drugs. It encourages
- developments in this direction and has been participating in projects of the
- United Nations International Drug Control Programme (UNDCP). These projects are
- aimed at different aspects of the problem, such as strengthening the social and
- economic intrastructure, demand reduction (e.g. projects in Bolivia and
- Colombia), and supporting the drafting of legislation (Surinam). The
- Netherlands belongs to the Major Donors Group of UNDCP with a contribution to
- the regular annual budget of Fl. 700.000 in 1994. Also, The Netherlands is a
- member of the UN Commission on Narcotic Drugs (CND).
-
- ---
- Please send your local info for the Drug Price report; anonymously by mailing
- through a Cypherpunk remailer, Charcoal or rich%weeds.hacktic.nl@anon.penet.fi
-
- -----BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-----
- Version: 2.2
-
- mQCNAivX82sAAAEEAMLMJWpye3A5FBqCdLMwDM+IzPwK6PzLod+8wUNZllWvD+wS
- 1Ao8BYNHE8KjWxX+uV9THt1aRkgImty/VBtamStH8zrMJ40xIddeIlV8rkpgwau6
- hv2tJSdNpRc5BAzny1spgitv6BMF5J1YNMnLcRFGj6LE202F9kkIFFhJlb3nAAUT
- tCpSaWNoYXJkIHYuZC4gSG9yc3QgPHJpY2hAd2VlZHMuaGFja3RpYy5ubD4=
- =VSSK
- -----END PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-----
-
-
-